Kids Count shows Ky. tops in smoking by pregnant mothers, has a wide range of local data about children's well-being

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

The annual Kids Count report on children's well-being, released Tuesday by the Annie E. Casey Foundation and Kentucky Youth Advocates, says the state leads the nation in smoking by pregnant mothers and more than one in four children in Kentucky lived in poverty in 2012. It argues for improvements in preventive care and newborn health throughout the state.

The report is part of the 23rd annual release of the County Data Book, which contains a wide range of county-by-county data that are indicators of children's well-being. Unlike previous annual reports, this one ranks Kentucky counties on overall child well-being and on four domains: economic security, education, health, and family and community strength.

The county-by-county assessment found seven counties that scored substantially higher on overall child well-being rankings: Boone, Calloway, Meade, Oldham, Spencer, Washington, and Woodford. The six counties clearly at the bottom, in descending order, were Owsley, Knox, Elliot, Martin, Fulton, and Clay.

Health affects almost every aspect of child well-being. On the four scores in the Health domain (smoking during pregnancy, low-birthweight babies, asthma hospitalizations and teen births) Oldham and Boone counties scored much higher than other counties, and Bell and Fulton counties, in the southeastern and southwestern corners of the state, scored the lowest.

The chart to the right indicates how much worse Bell and Fulton ranked than similar counties. 

The data from this year’s Kids Count book, as well as new and historical data for the many other indicators Kentucky Youth Advocates tracks, can be found at the Kids Count Data Center by clicking here. The data cover counties, school districts, cities and Metro Louisville council districts.

Based on the latest available data from 34 comparable states, in 2011 Kentucky had the highest rate of women who smoked during pregnancy. Nationally, 9 percent smoked during pregnancy while 23 percent did in Kentucky.


Babies born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy are more likely to suffer low birth weight, premature birth and infant death, and almost one in every 10 babies in Kentucky were born at low birth weight, says the report. While the national average for low-birthweight babies is 8.1 percent of all live births, low-birth-weight babies made up more than 14 percent of births to mothers in Lawrence, Lewis, Martin, and Wolfe counties.

“We know smoke-free policies will reduce smoking during pregnancy and reduce the number of babies born at a low birth weight,” said Terry Brooks, executive director of Kentucky Youth Advocates. “It’s time to do what works and enact a comprehensive, statewide smoke-free law. We need to protect all children, not just those lucky enough to be born in a smoke-free community.”


In addition to babies born to mothers who smoke during pregnancy, those born to teenage mothers are at increased risk of low birth weight and other health problems, says the report.

While the state's rate of births to teenage mothers has declined each year since 2007, it remains higher than the national average, which has shown a similar decline. There were 43 teen births for every 1,000 females aged 15-19 in 2011, compared to the national rate of 31. The report says Oldham County had the lowest rate of teen births (1.3 percent) while McCreary County had the highest (8.6 percent). It also says the most effective way to keep reducing teen births rate is to educate young people about sex and risky sexual behaviors, and to provide access to contraceptive methods.

While Kentucky has made progress in providing health-care coverage for children and newborns, the state is among the leaders in childhood obesity, diabetes and asthma, and has a greater-than-average number of children with disabilities or other chronic health problems like cystic fibrosis or heart disease, the report says. "Yet families face many hurdles when they seek treatment for their children. They may lack health insurance or lack transportation," it says. "Some areas do not have enough health-care providers."

Report calls for investments in Kentucky children

Higher teen-birth rates are found among communities of color, which are also disproportionately affected by poverty, says the report. One in four of Kentucky's children live in poverty.

This rate and the number of unemployed parents, which went up by 24,000 between 2007 and 2012, have increased since the 2008-09 recession. Poverty rates in 2012 were highest among African American children (52 percent) and Hispanic or Latino children (41 percent). Living in a high-poverty area puts a child at greater risk for poor health and educational outcomes.

A widespread lack of economic security is perhaps the greatest concern for many kids in the state, says the report. The Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services recently cut spending for the Child Care Assistance Program and the Kinship Care Program. As a result, 8,700 families lost assistance for child care, and financial support was also eliminated for main relatives who raise children unable to live with their parents. The report calls for restoration of these programs and more investments in Kentucky’s children.

"Taken together, the data tell a clear story: Kentucky kids need the attention of Kentucky leaders," says the report. “It’s time to make children and families a priority in our state by investing in programs that keep parents working and promote economic security,” said Brooks.

Click here to get more information about the Annie E. Casey Foundation or view its policy reports.

Book chronicles Hall's 40-year battle for health, against poverty

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

Eula Hall has been called an angel, dynamite, a force to be reckoned with, and a living legend. She has dedicated her life to combating poverty in Appalachia and providing health care to those in need. Some say that she has done more for health care in Eastern Kentucky than any other single person.

Even at age 86, Hall continues to fight against poverty, providing health care to those who need it. Hall’s story will be told in a new biography, Mud Creek Medicine: The Life of Eula Hall and the Fight for Appalachia, written by Pikeville native Kiran Bhatraju.

Hall grew up in Pike County and moved to the Mud Creek community in adjoining Floyd County at the age of 16. She witnessed the devastating impact of poverty, including lack of health care, and became a staple in the Mud Creek community, someone to whom people would turn when they were sick or hungry.

In 1973, at age 46, Hall opened the doors to The Mud Creek Clinic in Grethel, Ky., a rural community in Floyd County, with a $1,400 donation and the help of two local doctors. The clinic rented space at first, but Hall quickly moved her family out of a nice home in Mud Creek so the home could be converted into a clinic to provide health care regardless of patients' ability to pay.

For 40 years, Hall’s clinic has weathered hard times, reports Jonathan Meador of WKMS in Murray. But, with resiliency and the help of the community, the clinic now operates in five locations and continues its mission: To provide Appalachia’s poorest residents with health care and dental services they can afford.

Hall says things have improved in Appalachia in the last 40 years, but she is still concerned that growing income inequality in America is leaving too many of her patients behind, reports Meador. Appalachians still face numerous economic and health disparities that are deeply rooted in poverty.

"We still have people who don't have enough to meet their needs," Hall told Meador. "These are good people; these are honest people, hard workin' people, when they were able. But you know, they're disadvantaged now, and they just don't have the means to meet their needs and stuff, and somebody has to be concerned; somebody has to look out for 'em."

Bhatraju says that proceeds of his book will go toward funding the clinic. Click here to purchase a copy of the book.

Beshear and two other Democratic governors say Obamacare is working in their states, and cite examples

Gov. Steve Beshear continues to be a major national cheerleader for the federal health-reform law, citing Kentucky examples in an op-ed piece he and the Democratic governors of Connecticut and Washington circulated to newspapers this week.

"People keep asking us why our states have been successful," they write. "Here’s a hint: It’s not about our websites. Sure, having functioning websites for our health-care exchanges makes the job of meeting the enormous demand for affordable coverage much easier, but each of our state websites has had its share of technical glitches. As we have demonstrated on a near-daily basis, Web sites can continually be improved to meet consumers’ needs. The [Patient Protection and] Affordable Care Act has been successful in our states because our political and community leaders grasped the importance of expanding health-care coverage and have avoided the temptation to use health-care reform as a political football."

All three governors expanded the Medicaid program to include people with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line. Beshear cites two independent studies that showed Kentucky "couldn’t afford not to expand Medicaid. Expansion offered huge savings in the state budget and is expected to create 17,000 jobs." The state will have to start helping pay for the expansion in 2017, but Beshear has argued that the economic activity from more health care will cover that bill.

At least one of Beshear's co-authors, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, is not allowing insurance companies to renew policies that don't comply with the law, as President Obama allowed last week. But they wrote, "What we all agree with completely, though, is the president’s insistence that our country cannot go back to the dark days before health-care reform, when people were regularly dropped from coverage, and those with 'bare bones' plans ended up in medical bankruptcy when serious illness struck, many times because their insurance didn’t cover much of anything.
Thanks to health-care reform and the robust exchanges in our states, people are getting better coverage at a better price."

As an example, Beshear cited Howard Stovall, whose sign and graphics business in Lexington "has paid half the cost of health insurance for his eight employees" since it opened in 1998. "With the help of Stovall’s longtime insurance agent and Kentucky’s health exchange, Kynect, Stovall’s employees are saving 5 percent to 40 percent each on new health insurance plans with better benefits. Stovall can afford to provide additional employee benefits, including full disability coverage and part of the cost of vision and dental plans, while still saving the business 50 percent compared with the old plans." (Read more)

Beshear, writing in The New York Times, defends Obamacare

Ever since he decided to expand Medicaid with money from the federal health-reform law, Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear has been telling opponents of Obamacare to "Get over it." Now, as Republicans have made the law the sticking point in talks to keep the government open and cover the national debt, Beshear has taken that argument to a national audience.

"Get over it, and get out of the way, so I can help my people. Here in Kentucky, we cannot afford to waste another day or another life," Beshear concluded in an op-ed piece in The New York Times on Friday. While not naming Sens. Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul, he took some swings at them.

"Sunday morning news programs identify Kentucky as the red state with two high-profile Republican senators who claim their rhetoric represents an electorate that gave President Obama only about a third of its presidential vote in 2012," Beshear wrote. "So why then is Kentucky — more quickly than almost any other state — moving to implement the Affordable Care Act?"

The real answer is that Beshear is a Democrat and Kentucky law allowed him to expand Medicaid and create a state-based health-insurance marketplace without approval of the legislature, which is divided between the parties. But the governor answered his question another way: "Because there’s a huge disconnect between the rank partisanship of national politics and the outlook of governors whose job it is to help beleaguered families, strengthen work forces, attract companies and create a balanced budget."

Beshear noted that several Republican governors have expanded Medicaid and/or created insurance exchanges, saying they "see the Affordable Care Act not as a referendum on President Obama but as a tool for historic change. That is especially true in Kentucky, a state where residents’ collective health has long been horrendous."

Beshear said health insurance will now be available to the 640,000 uninsured Kentuckians. "Lack of health coverage puts their health and financial security at risk. They roll the dice and pray they don’t get sick. They choose between food and medicine. They ignore checkups that would catch serious conditions early. They put off doctor’s appointments, hoping a condition turns out to be nothing. And they live knowing that bankruptcy is just one bad diagnosis away. Furthermore, their children go long periods without checkups that focus on immunizations, preventive care and vision and hearing tests. If they have diabetes, asthma or infected gums, their conditions remain untreated and unchecked. For Kentucky as a whole, the negative impact is similar but larger — jacked-up costs, decreased worker productivity, lower quality of life, depressed school attendance and a poor image. . . . Frankly, we can’t implement the Affordable Care Act fast enough." (Read more) 

Kentucky poverty rate is fifth highest in U.S., but a larger share of Kentuckians had health insurance in 2012 than in 2011

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

In 2012, as U.S. incomes remained lower and poverty rates higher than in 2007, the year before the recession, Kentucky poverty rates increased and one in four Kentucky children were living in poverty, according to estimates released Thursday by the U.S. Census Bureau. However, the percentage of Kentuckians with health insurance increased.

Kentucky had the fifth highest percentage of residents living in poverty (19.4 percent) in 2012, up from 18.8 percent in 2011. It ranked behind Mississippi (24.2 percent), New Mexico (20.8), Louisiana (19.9) and Arkansas (19.8). However, it was statistically tied with the last two states for third place because the error margin for the estimates is plus or minus 0.5 percentage points. Nationally, 2012 was the second straight year that the U.S. poverty rate had failed to improve. It remained at 15 percent, with 46.5 million people earning at or below the federal poverty line. Click here for an interactive poverty rate map from Stateline.

These findings highlight the challenges that Kentuckians face regarding economic security relative to the rest of the country. The high poverty rate should also act as a warning since it presages troubles with education, health and other areas, Terry Brooks, director of Kentucky Youth Advocates, told Chris Kenning of The Courier-Journal.

The figures are three-year rolling averages from the American Community Survey, a continuing poll of Americans. It estimated that 595,260 Kentuckians were uninsured in 2012, indicating an uninsured rate decline to 13.9 percent, from 14.7 percent. Overall, the U.S. uninsured rate dropped from 15.7 in 2011 to 15.4 percent in 2012, with the number of the uninsured statistically unchanged at 48 million. Insured rates tend to rise as employment rises.

Among the estimated 1 million Kentucky households earning less than $25,000 a year, 22.6 percent do not have health coverage. Kentuckians aged 19 to 25 had the highest percentage of unisureds for a specific age group; about 400,000 Kentuckians are in that group, and 28.1 percent of them are uninsured.

The national decline in the uninsured rate was modest compared to a bigger drop in 2011 that resulted from the federal health reform law that allowed people 26 or younger to be covered on their parents' plans. The slight dip in the national uninsured rate for 2012 was due mostly to increases in government coverage, such as Medicaid and Medicare.

Nationally, the coverage by employer-provided health insurance for people under 65 remained stable. Kentucky, Michigan and Vermont were the only states to see a statistically significant increase in the rate of private health insurance coverage from 2010 to 2012.

The Census Bureau's American FactFinder report generator provides specific information about health insurance coverage.  For example, the chart below comes from a report about the types of health insurance coverage for specific age groups, and it shows estimates of the types of coverage for Kentuckians ages from 35 through 64.

When the main provisions of the health law take effect in 2014, expansion of the state Medicaid program with federal money is expected to provide free health care to as many as 308,000 Kentuckians at up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level -- currently $15,856 for an individual or $32,499 for a family of four.

The state will also offer federal tax credits for Kentuckians who lack job-based health insurance and buy private coverage through the new state health insurance exchange, Kynect, which opens for enrollment on Oct 1. Click here to read more about Kynect or to check your eligibility for coverage or subsidies.

Earlier, the Census Bureau reported there were 46.5 million people in the U.S. living in poverty median household income remained steady from the year before and was $51,017. Kentucky had a median household income of $46,362 in 2012, compared to the U.S. median of $51,371.  Click here for an interactive median income map from Stateline.

Congressman visits Telehealth Primary Care Clinic in Campton

U.S. Rep. Andy Barr

U.S. Rep. Andy Barr, a freshman Republican from the Sixth District, recently visited the Telehealth Primary Care Clinic in Campton. The clinic, one of two in Kentucky funded by federal telehealth grants, opened in August 2012, and "provides access to primary and specialty care for the community through network established by KentuckyOne Health, the largest health system in the Commonwealth," reports KyForward.

Shelley Neal of KentuckyOne told KyForward, “We established these clinics to make quality health care accessible to the communities in and surrounding Powell and Wolfe counties. If we are to be successful in our mission to create a healthier Kentucky, we must continue to implement new technologies and services to reach our state’s medically underserved communities.”

The clinics minimize "the need to travel to see a specialist therefore reducing the costs of care," KyForward writes. The newest addition is a social worker, who serves both clinics. Through the first six months of this year the social worker "helped 185 patients complete financial assistance paperwork to obtain drug assistance for 1,804 medication orders." During that same span, the clinic saw 1,417 patients from 34 counties. The clinics, which have specialists in cardiology and pulmonology, plan to add specialists in urology, obstetrics and gynecology, endocrinology, neurology and psychiatry. (Read more)

Free medical screenings, dental work for teens and adults available in Mayfield through Tuesday

West Kentuckians in need of health care can get free medical, dental and optical screenings through Tuesday, Aug. 13 at the old Morgan Haugh Clinic building at 220 W. Walnut St. in Mayfield from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., including Saturday and Sunday.

The screenings are a program of the Delta Regional Authority and the Department of Defense. Anyone is eligible to receive the free services, which do not include emergency or obstetrical treatments. For adults and children age two and up, medical screenings, non-emergency medical treatment, minor lab tests, prescription assistance and optometry exams are available. For adults and children 13 and up, dental exams, extractions and fillings are also available.

Services will be provided by 152 medical personnel from the U.S. Army Reserve and the Army National Guard. Other current clinic sites are in Blytheville, Ark., Hayti, Mo., and Dyersburg, Tenn. Earlier clinics were held in Martin, Tenn., Helena-West Helena, Ark., and four communities in western Mississippi.

Kids Count report shows where children in your county and school district rank, in a huge number of measures

Conditions have improved slightly for Kentucky children, especially in education and health, and the state's overall well-being ranking has gone up one spot, from 35th to 34th in the nation. But economic conditions for young Kentuckians have slipped since last year, says the Kids Count report released Monday by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

The annual report measures how the country and its 50 states are doing according to four measures of child well-being – education, health, economic well-being, and family and community. How well Kentucky's children score in each domain paints a picture of Kentucky's future.

One of the many data sets available by county and school district

The report includes a wide range of data for every county and school district. The data include current and five-year rates of child poverty; median family income and median household income; infant mortality rate; child death rate; teen death rate; child abuse and neglect cases; foster care cases; births to mothers who are teenagers, who smoke, who are not high-school graduates, and who get early and regular prenatal care; pre-term births; low-weight births; newborns breastfed when they leave the hospital; early childhood obesity, number and percentage of child-support collections; asthma hospitalizations; recreational facilities; number and percentage of children receiving food stamps, Medicaid, child-care subsidies, Supplemental Security Income, and benefits from the Women, Infants and Children nutrition program; the number and percentage eligible for reduced-price meals at school; the number and percentage in publicly funded preschool; the hourly wage needed to pay fair-market rent and the percentage of renters unable to afford such rent; juvenile justice data; percentage of students ready for college and careers; and the six-year college graduation rate.

Statewide, the report shows that Kentucky has made gains in education, and the state ranks 28th on this measure. Since 2005, more children are attending preschool, more fourth-graders are proficient in reading and more eighth-graders are proficient in math, says the report.

Kentucky has also improved in many health measures. There are fewer low birth-weight babies, fewer children without health insurance and fewer teens who abuse alcohol or drugs. Medical coverage should only continue to improve as the state expands Medicaid coverage to households at 138 percent of the poverty line. However, youth advocates say gains in education and health may not be maintained if more children continue to live in poverty.

Unfortunately, Kentucky children continue to struggle economically, weighing in at 32nd in the nation. The report says 37 percent of Kentucky children have parents who lack stable employment, up from 33 percent last year, and 32 percent of children live in households that are burdened by housing costs, up from 27 percent.

The state's lowest ranking is 38th, on the family and community measure. Its constituents: More than 27 percent of children live below the poverty line, compared to the national average of 23 percent, and the number of children in single-parent families has increased from 31 percent in 2006 to 36 percent in 2011. On the bright side, teen births declined during that period.

With the hard work of child advocates, community agencies, educators and policymakers, the report shows progress has been made to improve children's well-being, but there is still much to be done. Click here for Kentucky's profile or here to go to the data center.

Kentucky Spirit appeals court ruling that it can't quit Kentucky early

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

Centene Corp. announced Monday that it has appealed the Franklin Circuit Court ruling in May that said its managed care subsidiary, Kentucky Spirit, cannot terminate its contract with the state a year early. The company said it plans to be out of the state by September. Click here to view the appeal.

This move represents the continuation of a long, tumultuous relationship between Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family Services and Kentucky Spirit, one of three companies hired by the state in November 2011 to manage health care for more than 540,000 Medicaid recipients.

First, Kentucky Spirit announced in October 2012 that it was pulling out of Kentucky's managed-care system because it was losing money, and the company also filed a formal dispute with the cabinet for damages incurred under the contract. Centene said in its annual report that Medicaid beneficiaries were retroactively assigned to the plan and non-inpatient claims receipts were higher than anticipated, leading to a $38.8 million loss in the second quarter of 2012.

"Since the inception of the contract, we have been in discussions with the cabinet about our concerns with the Medicaid managed care program but have been unable to resolve our differences," Jesse Hunter, Centene’s executive vice president of operations, told St. Louis Business Journal in October of last year. In response CHFS Secretary Audrey Haynes said, “I am deeply frustrated that this publicly traded, Fortune 500 company has chosen to put profits above people and will not honor the terms of its contract."

Next, Franklin Circuit Judge Thomas Wingate ruled that the company could face fines if it terminates its three-year contract before expiration in July 2014, and Centene said it would consider an appeal. Now, as Michael Neirdorff told investors on Monday, Centene is appealing that decision, reports Samantha Liss of St. Louis Business Journal.

“After a few months of operations, it became clear that our financial performance was much different than our projections based upon the data provided by the Commonwealth during the bid process. Our analysis concluded that inaccurate and incomplete data led to actuarially unsound rates for our health plan,” said Nerdorff at Monday's Investor Day event.

All managed-care companies received the same information, and Centene made the lowest bid. Kentucky originally signed a three-year contract with Centene in the summer of 2011, and the company was estimated to service about 180,000 Medicaid beneficiaries, generating an annual revenue of $700 million. Instead, it serves 140,000 recipients and lost $38.8 in one quarter.

However, Centene's $38.8 million quarterly loss in 2012 came alongside $2.2 billion in revenue, and the company's publicly-traded shares surged 11 percent after it announced that it was leaving the state. In April of this year, Centene raised its full-year forecast for premium and service revenue to $10.1 billion to $10.4 billion, Reuters reports.

Fewer families report having trouble paying medical bills; near-poor struggle more than poor families

Fewer American families are having problems paying medical bills, but 20 percent of them, particularly those without insurance and those that are "near poor" but not :poor," still struggle with health costs, says a study released Tuesday by the National Center for Health Statistics.

The report says 54.2 million people, or 20.3 percent of families headed by someone under the age of 65, had difficulty covering medical expenses in the first half of 2012. During the first half of 2011, 21.7 percent of families, or 57.8 million people, found it difficult to pay medical bills.

Hispanics (25.2 percent) and blacks (27.9 percent) were more likely than whites (20.1 percent) or Asians (10.3 percent) to report trouble paying their medical bills, says the report. It says families with incomes from 100 to 199 percent of the poverty line were most likely to have difficulty paying medical bills, probably because those below the poverty line qualify for Medicaid. State income limits vary; in Kentucky, income-based Medicaid is available to those with incomes less than 70 percent of the poverty line.

'Poor' are below the poverty line. 'Near poor' had incomes of 100 to 199 percent of the poverty line. 

Among families with insurance, 14 percent of those with private insurance and 25.6 percent  with Medicaid or other public insurance had similar problems paying bills in the first half of 2012, which represents a 1.7 percent and 2.5 percent decrease from 2011, respectively. For a report on the study, click here.

Medicaid expansion could change Kentucky's course, big time

NEWS ANALYSIS

By Al Cross

Kentucky Health News

"Today we change the course of Kentucky's history."

It is not often that a public official can say such a thing with a large measure of credibility, but Gov. Steve Beshear legitimately raised that hope Thursday, as he announced that he would expand Kentucky's Medicaid program under federal health reform.

Beshear with graph predicting positive impact on budget

If Beshear's vision is fulfilled, Kentucky will no longer have one of the unhealthiest populations of any state, a change that will make it more attractive to employers, and any Kentuckian who wants health insurance will be able to get it.

It is in large measure the realization, in the state where all President Harry Truman's grandparents were born, of his 68-year-old dream of national health insurance. The statue of Truman's vice president, Alben Barkley of Paducah, seemed to shine a little more brightly than usual in the Capitol rotunda as the press-conference crowd dispersed.

But this is a project with many moving parts -- billions of dollars, thousands of health-care providers, hundreds of thousands of Medicaid beneficiaries, and scores of political and bureaucratic decisions -- and much could go wrong.

Skeptics point to the problems with the managed-care Medicaid system that Beshear implemented too hurriedly, apparently to avoid complicating his November 2011 re-election, and argue that the program needs fixing before adding 300,000 new enrollees to the 825,000 already on the rolls. Beshear says he's tackling the problems, the program is "working pretty well" and the managed-care companies can handle the influx.

The skeptics also question whether the state can afford the match for the federal funds. "Broad and vague anxieties," Beshear called them, and he came armed with two studies concluding that expansion would actually gain the state money -- mainly because of the billions it will send to the state's health-care providers, creating more jobs, but also because many of the 300,000 or so newly eligible people are not expected to enroll, based on a Price Waterhouse Coopers study drawing on research by the Congressional Budget Office.

University of Louisville research

Preliminary estimates were that expansion would add 400,000 Kentuckians to the Medicaid rolls. However, the study estimated that only 308,000 will become eligible and that only 188,000 will enroll, thus costing the state much less than some expected when it has to match federal funds beginning in January 2017. The initial match will be 5 percent, rising to 10 percent in 2020. The estimated cost for the newly eligible in fiscal 2020-21 is $151 million, in a state budget that is likely to exceed $10 billion. (The state's current share of Medicaid costs, 29.5 percent, is about $1.5 billion a year.)

Those are just estimates. "I believe reality will dwarf those numbers on the spending side," Tea Party activist David Adams, who says he plans to challenge the plan in court, told reporters. But for the time being at least, Beshear has the numbers on his side, and he said they are "very conservative."

The governor said opponents of the plan "fall back on national politics" and say expansion means that Kentucky, a state that President Obama lost big both times, will be "supporting Obamacare. To them I say, 'Get over it.' . . . I'm going to do what's best for Kentucky's people, period." Asked why so many governors have rejected expansion, he said it was mostly "partisan politics."

Conservative columnist John David Dyche cites an Oregon study saying Medicaid is ineffective, but a Harvard School of Public Health study in three other states showed that expansion of Medicaid improves health and saves lives.

Beshear said the expansion, along with health insurance and subsidies available through a state-run exchange that is also part of health reform, would give the state a healthier workforce because studies show that people with health insurance are less likely to skip exams and let health conditions worsen and become costlier and more difficult to treat. "The lack of early care is one reason that Kentucky's health picture is so horrendous," he said.

Kentucky's workforce is one of the nation's least healthy, and the state has a disproportionate number of working-age people who are not in the workforce because of health problems. The state ranks first in smoking, cancer deaths and preventable hospitalizations; second in heart disease and poor physical-health days; third in heart attacks and poor mental-health days; and in the top 10 in diabetes,  cholesterol and sedentary lifestyles. That hurts the state's image as well as its economy, Beshear said. "There will be a huge economic effect for a healthier Kentucky."

He said most of the newly eligible people are not "freeloaders asking for a handout," but people who are working at jobs without health insurance. He said another 332,000 Kentuckians will get insurance through the state exchange, 276,000 of them with subsidies available to people with incomes up to 400 percent of the poverty level. Without Medicaid expansion, he said, 206,000 would not be eligible for Medicaid or a subsidy, and "We cannot leave those people stranded."

The health-reform law tried to force states into expanding Medicaid, but the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the states should make the choice without fear of financial penalties. The law calls for expansion to cover people under 65 in households up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level -- currently $15,856 for an individual or $32,499 for a family of four.

Republicans can do little to stop the expansion. They control the state Senate, but Medicaid eligibility and benefit decisions belong to the executive branch, and even if a bipartisan legislative committee were to block the implementing regulations, Beshear could override it.

Or perhaps we should say he would override it. Emotional at times, Beshear called the move "the single most important decision of our lifetime for improving the health of Kentuckians" but said it was easy to make. As a governor who has failed to win his main campaign promise, expanded gambling, and has had relatively little money to spend because of the Great Recession, this is likely to be his largest legacy.

For details and background from the governor's office, click here. For Beshear's YouTube commentary on the issue, click here.

Beshear looks likely to announce that he will expand Medicaid

Gov. Steve Beshear appears likely to announce tomorrow that he will expand Kentucky's Medicaid program to people in households with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, under federal health-care reform.

The notice of the governor's news conference about "Decision regarding Medicaid expansion" says it will be held in the ornate State Reception Room on the second floor of the state Capitol, an unlikely venue for an announcement that would disappoint so many of his natural allies in the Democratic Party. And Rep. Tom Burch, D-Louisville, chairman of the House Health and Welfare Committee, reiterated his February prediction that Beshear would expand Medicaid, cn|2 reports.

Under health reform, the federal government would pay all the cost of the estimated 400,000 newly eligible Kentuckians in Medicaid in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The state would pay 3 percent of the added cost in 2017, rising to 10 percent in 2020. Beshear has said the state should expand Medicaid if it can afford it.

Some Republicans have said the state can't afford it, but national research has estimated that the state's cost for Medicaid would increase only 5 to 6 percent over the amount it would pay if the program were not expanded. The federal government now pays more than 70 percent of the program's cost in Kentucky.

More background on Mediaid in Kentucky is available from a PowerPoint presentation that Deputy Medicaid Commissioner Lisa Lee gave yesterday at a meeting sponsored by the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky and the Kentucky Rural Health Association. It can be downloaded here.

Beshear says he will decide in four to five weeks, or July 1 at the latest, whether or not to expand Medicaid

By Al Cross
Kentucky Health News
This story has been updated.

Gov. Steve Beshear said Monday that he will decide within the next four to five weeks, or maybe by July 1, whether to expand the Medicaid program under federal health-care reform.

Beshear, who has said he would expand Medicaid if the state can afford it, told reporters that he is considering other factors, which he did not name. He said his administration has not calculated the cost of expansion, which the state would not pay immediately.

The federal government pays about 71 percent of Medicaid's cost in Kentucky, and would pay the full cost of covering those newly eligible in 2014-16. The state would have to pay 3 percent in 2017, rising to 10 percent by 2020.

About 830,000 Kentuckians are covered by Medicaid, and at least 400,000 more could be added if Beshear expanded it to include households earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, as required by the reform law.

Another possibility is that Beshear would seek approval from the federal government to use federal money to subsidize purchase of private health insurance by the poor, which has been approved in Arkansas but not in Tennessee.

The governor's office, asked if the administration was considering that option and what other factors Beshear is considering, has not responded had this response: "The governor is considering multiple issues as he determines whether Kentucky will expand Medicaid eligibility.  Along with affordability for the state, he is also looking at potential economic impact through jobs and investment created by possible expansion, as well anticipated changes in health outcomes for newly-eligible Kentuckians."

That is also the case with There has still been no response from Humana Inc., which does much of its business through government-financed health plans. The Louisville-based insurance company was asked if it has had discussions with the Beshear administration about the idea of a Medicaid expansion that would use federal money to buy, or subsidize the purchase of, private health insurance.

"Beshear said Monday that he is getting a lot of pressure from the medical field – particularly hospitals – to green-light the expansion," Beth Musgrave of the Lexington Herald-Leader writes. "Hospitals will lose additional money they receive through Medicaid on Jan. 1 as part of the Affordable Care Act. Hospitals in Ohio and other states have also put pressure on state governments to expand Medicaid rolls."

Beshear said, “I think they look at the expansion as a means to at least replace some of that (money) that they are going to lose.”

Many Republicans have opposed expansion, "saying that the state could not afford it," Musgrave writes. "The Republican-led state Senate passed a bill during the legislative session that would have required that the two-term Democratic governor get legislative approval before expanding the health care program. But the measure died in the Democratic-controlled House. Beshear could expand the program via executive order."

Beshear said today, “We have a very large uninsured population and we have a very unhealthy population. Anything that we can do — that we can afford — to make our population more healthy, I”m certainly in favor of doing.” He added, “We are looking long-term as well as short-term from a financial standpoint to see if it makes sense for us.”

While he said he would act within four to five weeks, Beshear gave himself some wiggle room, saying also that he would make the decision by July 1, the beginning of the state's fiscal year. (Read more)

Will Kentucky expand Medicaid, and if so, how?

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

Kentucky is one of the last states to decide whether to expand Medicaid under federal health reform, and now that the General Assembly has gone home, Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear can turn his attention to the many questions that linger. Some Republican legislators think he will expand the program, but they worry about the cost when the state would have to start helping cover the new expenses, beginning in 2017.

Republican Gov. Bill Haslam of Tennessee decided Wednesday that he will not pursue Medicaid expansion, saying that it could put hospitals in financial jeopardy by giving them more patients on which they lose money, reports Michelle Kaske of Bloomberg. If he is right and the same logic applies to Kentucky, Medicaid expansion in the state could harm the rural hospitals and providers -- some of whom are already squeezed by the issues with the new managed-care system.

Along with Kentucky, 10 other states are undecided about Medicaid expansion: Alaska, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, New York, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming. The map by The Advisory Board Company shows the lay of the land; for an interactive picture that outlines the research behind the map, click here.

Red=Not participating; Pink=Leaning toward not participating;
Gray=Undecided; Blue=Participating; Light Blue=Leaning toward participating

Only three states with Democratic governors are undecided; 18 Republican governors have rejected expansion. Kentucky is shown as leaning for it because Beshear has repeatedly said that he will expand Medicaid if the state can afford it. He has also mentioned that the state can reserve the right to pull out of the deal in 2017, when it must paying 3 percent of the cost of covering the newly insured, reaching 10 percent in 2020. Still, the questions about cost and affordability remain, and Beshear could be considering another option.

Tennessee has joined Ohio and Arkansas in negotiating with the Obama administration over plans to use federal Medicaid money to purchase private insurance for those who can't afford it but don't qualify for Medicaid now. However, Haslam's plan has been held up because the administration placed too many conditions on the money, writes Kaske. Republicans in other states, including Florida, Louisiana, Pennsylvania and Texas, have expressed interest in this option since Gov. Mike Beebe of Arkansas, a Democrat, ignited the wildfire of creating a hybrid of the two alternatives, reports Robert Pear of The New York Times.

The idea of privatizing Medicaid expansion appeals to many doctors and hospitals because they typically receive higher payments from commercial insurance than from Medicaid. However, many Kentucky hospitals and providers are concerned about the managed-care program that is run by three private organizations, and are calling for immediate action. Beshear has not said whether he will sign or veto a bill that would subject the managed-care firms to the prompt-payments and dispute-resolution rules of the state Department of Insurance.

"Action is needed to address the problems that patients and hospitals are experiencing with Medicaid managed care and to make the system work properly," wrote Harold "Bud" Warman, chair of the Kentucky Hospital Association, and Charles Lovell, chair-elect of the association, in a recent Herald-Leader article that laid out the various problems with the system. "And with the possibility that Medicaid will be expanded in Kentucky to include an additional 350,000 people, it is critical that these issues be addressed right away to avoid even greater problems in the future."

Either using federal dollars to buy private insurance in order to cover newly qualified individuals (the hybrid plan) under the health law's expansion  or expanding in the "traditional" way will not change the current managed care structure of Medicaid in Kentucky. Yet, it would mean that 350,000 more Kentuckians would be covered under managed care; Medicaid would cover those earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, currently up to $15,856 a year for an individual.

The money that the federal government offers for expansion is very tempting. The question then may be, how will it be used?

Kentucky Health News is an independent news service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Study finds only counties in Appalachia, mostly in Kentucky, had increasing rates of death among both sexes as century turned

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

More than 40 percent of counties saw increases in female death rates as the 21st Century began, while the death rate for men rose in just 3 percent of counties, a study shows. Only Appalachian counties, mostly in Kentucky, had worsening rates for both sexes. (Click on a map for a larger version.)

Change In Male Mortality Rates From 1992–96 To 2002–06

Change In Female Mortality Rates From 1992–96 To 2002–06

On the Health Affairs maps above, blue counties showed substantial improvement, while those in aqua showed minimal improvement and worsening counties are in red.

The study identifies some shared characteristics among the 1,334 counties where more women are dying prematurely, but the main factors weren't medical or behavioral, according to David Kindig and Erika Cheng, authors of the study report.

Although counties with high rates of smoking and obesity had increased mortality rates, the report found socioeconomic factors in the Appalachian states of Kentucky and West Virginia, such as the percentage of a county’s population with a college education and the rate of children living in poverty, had more to do with increased mortality rates.

In Kentucky, Owsley County has been ranked last on health-related measures by the Population Health Institute. Areas like this in Appalachia suffered rising death rates in both sexes because college education is a rarity, child poverty is normal, recreational facilities are scarce, restaurants are mostly fast-food outlets, and adults lack social support, reports Geoffrey Cowley of msnbc.

The chart below shows how Kentucky compares to the national average in premature death and that Owsley County suffers from tremendously high rates.

County Health Rankings by University of Wisconsin's Population Health
Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (countyhealthrankings.org)

These findings provide supporting evidence for the ever-increasing need for significant health improvement efforts in Appalachia. According to the report, efforts must extend beyond a focus on health care delivery and include stronger policies affecting health behaviors and the social and environmental determinants of health,with corresponding investments in those areas. (Read more)

Kentucky Health News is an independent news service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Survey suggests Great Recession has harmed the health of Kentuckians

A recent poll shows continuation of a trend threatening Kentucky's overall health: as the number of Kentuckians living in poverty goes up, the percentage of adults who report their health as excellent or very good goes down.

Just over four in 10 Kentucky adults in the latest Kentucky Health Issues Poll described their health as excellent or good. In 2008, almost half used those descriptions.

People with higher incomes have consistently reported better health since the poll began tracking the health status of Kentucky adults 2008. Since research has shown a strong link between higher income and better health, the Great Recession and the resulting increases in unemployment, underemployment and poverty appear to be harming the overall health of Kentucky’s population.

In the accompanying graph, showing responses by income categories, FPL stands for federal poverty level, which in 2011 was a yearly household income of $22,350. Among the categories, 58 percent in the highest category said their health is excellent or good, but only 25 percent of those living in poverty used those descriptions.

Although the health status for each income category has remained fairly constant, the poll reflects federal data that show more people living in poverty. More than 33 percent in the latest poll were earning less than the federal poverty level; in 2008, that was only 19 percent. The polls, which used self-reporting of income and survey methods that differ from federal methods, showed much higher poverty rates than federal data.

“We know there is a direct relationship between income and good health, and these data reflect that,” said Dr. Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, a sponsor of the poll. “While changes in our health-care delivery system may provide more health-care opportunities for low-income Kentuckians, these results show how vital a strong economy, and jobs that pay well, are to our population’s health.”

The poll, co-sponsored by the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, was taken Sept. 20 through Oct. 14 by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati. A random sample of 1,680 adults throughout Kentucky was interviewed by landline and cell telephones. The poll's margin of error is plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.

Kasich of Ohio is fifth Republican governor to accept Medicaid expansion; he and others cite need to protect rural hospitals, poor

Several Republican governors have decided to expand Medicaid under federal health-care reform, saying their conservative principles were outweighed by a need to protect their state's rural hospitals and low-income people. Yesterday, the governor of one of the biggest states got on the bandwagon.

John Kasich of Ohio joined Jan Brewer of Arizona, Brian Sandoval of Nevada, Susana Martinez of New Mexico and Jack Dalrymple of North Dakota in saying they will take heavy federal subsidies to expand the program to households with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty threshold.

Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear of Kentucky has said he wants to expand Medicaid if Kentucky can afford it, and he expects to get cost estimates around the end of March.

While Kasich is not an "Obamacare" supporter, he said expanding Medicaid “makes great sense for Ohio” because it would save $235 million over the next two years and free about $100 million in local funds for mental-health and addiction services, reports The Columbus Dispatch.

Kasich said the decision could extend health coverage to as many as 578,000 uninsured Ohio residents, and could keep everyone else’s health insurance premiums down because there won’t be so many uninsured people going to emergency rooms for their medical care, reports David Nather of Politico.

Kasich emphasized that he would like to see the 2010 law repealed, but the federal money it would pump into the state — about $13 billion over the next seven years — was too much to pass up, reports Stateline. The federal government will pay the full cost of expansion through 2016; then  states will have to pitch in, rising to a limit of 10 percent by 2020.

Brewer likewise said it doesn't make sense for Arizona to pass up federal dollars, reports Howard Fischer of the Arizona Daily Sun. "We will protect rural and safety-net hospitals from being pushed to the brink by growing their cost in caring for the uninsured," Brewer said. She also said the expansion will create enormous economic benefit, inject $2 billion into the Arizona economy, save and create thousands of jobs and provide health care to hundreds of thousands of low-income individuals, reports Fischer.

Brewer said going along with expansion will save Arizona money because the costs of providing care to the uninsured are not simply absorbed by hospitals but passed along through increased insurance premiums. Supporters of the expansion hope the five Republicans' decisions will prompt more GOP governors to follow suit. Twenty governors from both political parties are still undecided. (Read more)

Feds plan to let states impose co-payments on Medicaid patients above poverty level to encourage them to expand the program

By Molly Burchett and Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

If Kentucky expands its Medicaid program, it will probably be able to reduce the cost by requiring patients whose incomes are above the federal poverty level to help pay for their care. That could make it more feasible for the state to expand the program to people with incomes up to 138 percent of the poverty line.

A proposed federal policy will let states charge co-payments and increased premiums for doctor visits and some prescription drugs and hospital care. Robert Pear of The New York Times reports that the policy is designed to encourage states to expand Medicaid under the federal health-care reform law, with generous federal help. By shifting costs to patients, the state and federal governments would pay less.

That adds a new perspective to the cost consideration in Kentucky's debate over expansion of Medicaid. It could influence the state's decision, Republican state Sen. Julie Denton of Louisville said Friday during a legislative panel at the Kentucky Press Association convention.

Denton cautioned that the state needs to fix its problems with Medicaid managed care before it expands the program. Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear has said he wants to expand Medicaid if the state can afford it, and since there is no deadline for deciding whether to participate in the expansion, the debate may carry over into 2014.

Some Republicans have said Kentucky can't afford the expansion. If the state expands Medicaid eligibility to 138 percent of poverty from its current threshold of 70 percent, the federal government would pay all the cost of the expansion until 2017, when the state would begin helping out, with its share reaching 10 percent in 2020. The federal share of the state's current program is 72 percent.

This proposed rule could have important implications not just for state finances, but for Medicaid patients. It means that a family of three with an annual income of $30,000 could be required to pay $1,500 in premiums and co-payments, Pear reports in the Times.

As published in the Federal Register last week, the rule proposes to "update and simplify Medicaid premium and cost sharing requirements, to promote the most effective use of services and to assist states in identifying cost-sharing flexibilities." It proposes "new options for states to establish higher cost sharing for nonpreferred drugs and to propose higher cost sharing for non-emergency use" of emergency rooms.

Barbara K. Tomar, director of federal affairs at the American College of Emergency Physicians, told Pear that the administration had not adequately defined the “nonemergency services” for which the poor might have to pay. "In many cases, she said, patients legitimately believe they need emergency care, but the final diagnosis does not bear that out," Pear writes.

The proposed rule has no limit on emergency department charges for "non-emergency use." It says the hospital will have responsibility to assess the individual clinically and ensure access to other sources of care before requiring payment, which could pose problems for hospitals.

The public has until Feb. 13 to comment on the proposed rule, which can be submitted at www.regulations.gov.

Feds tell states it's all or nothing on Medicaid expansion; Washington Post map shows Ky. is only state 'leaning' toward it

By Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

When the Supreme Court upheld federal health reform but said states could opt out of the expansion of Medicaid to people with incomes above the poverty line, to be funded with generous federal subsidies, one of the first questions was whether a state had to go all the way: to 133 percent of poverty (138 percent with an official fudge factor). Now the Obama administration has answered "no." And that could make the decision tougher for Kentucky, which is the only state The Washington Post listed this month as leaning toward expansion.

The Post's Sarah Kliff wrote, "The administration’s reasoning goes like this: The federal government was giving states a really, really good deal on the Medicaid expansion. It was footing the entire bill for the newly eligible enrollees for three years," 2014 through 2016, rather than the 72 percent it pays Kentucky for current enrollees. The subsidy for the new eligibles would drop to 95 percent in 2017, 94 percent in 2018, 93 percent in 2019; and 90 percent in 2020.

White House aides told Kliff that in passing the bill, Congress (which is to say the Democrats in Congress) "gave states that really high funding in the service of a very specific goal: Ensuring all Americans have access to insurance options." But "If a state decided to cover, say, everyone up to the federal poverty line, they would be working with a smaller, more manageable population," Kliff explains. "Those living above the poverty line, meanwhile, wouldn’t be left in the lurch. The Affordable Care Act allows them to receive very generous subsidies in the private insurance market."

However, Medicaid Administrator Cindy Mann told Kliff that if states could fall short of the 133 percent level, they wouldn’t be within the spirit of the law. Kliff paraphrases Mann: "They wouldn’t offer all their residents a way to purchase affordable coverage, and if they’re not going to do that, the White House says they don’t deserve the extra funding."

Gov. Steve Beshear said again today that Kentucky should expand Medicaid "if we can afford it" because so many people in the state have no health insurance and are in poor health, and improving their health would be good for the state's economy.

Kentucky now makes Medicaid available to people with household incomes below 70 percent of the poverty line, which varies by household size. The Urban Institute has estimated that expanding the program to 133 percent of poverty would cost the state about 5 percent more than it would otherwise spend through 2022. That would be $1.3 billion extra in 2017-22, and some Republicans in the legislature have said the state can't afford it. The state expects to spend $1.5 billion on Medicaid in the 2013-14 fiscal year.

While the Post lists Kentucky as the only state "leaning yes" to expansion, it seems likely to be joined by several others. "States have stayed mum on whether they will participate in the expansion, seeing first if they could get a better deal — the partial expansion," Kliff writes. "The federal government took a while to show its cards; it wanted to see if states would sign up for the full expansion, without giving them a scaled-back option." Only 17 states have said yes, and as many are undecided, the Post reports.

In setting a firm rule, the White House may think states "will decide the 100 percent match is too good to pass up and that the federal money will pull everyone in," Kliff writes. "Or, it could indicate the Obama administration is okay with not all states participating with the Medicaid expansion on day one. Again, this wouldn’t be unprecedented: Only six states initially signed up for Medicaid when it launched in 1965."

States should realize that expanding Medicaid is a long-term investment in the health of their people that will pay off in the long run, Dr. Wayne Myers, who once ran Kentucky's rural-health office and was the first director of the federal Office of Rural Health Policy, writes in the Daily Yonder. He says that if a state doesn't expand Medicaid, many of its people will remain or become uninsured.

"Medicaid is a rural issue because a higher percentage of low-income people live in rural communities, and rural families are less likely to have private health insurance," Myers writes, adding that the program is also "a major economic driver." According to the National Center for Rural Health Works at Oklahoma State University, Medicaid was responsible for 113,000 jobs and a total of $10.5 billion in economic activity in Oklahoma in 2010.

Myers cites studies showing that patients with insurance who are hospitalized after accidents are 40 percent less likely to die than those without insurance, because uninsured patients got less attention from medical staff. Opting out of the expansion "may get a governor a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the foot, some dead hospitals and a bunch of dead citizens who needn't have died," Myers writes.

Kentucky Health News is a service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Four companies will oversee Medicaid coverage in 16-county Louisville region that includes 175,000 Kentuckians

Beginning Jan. 1, four companies will share management of the health care of roughly 175,000 Medicaid patients in the Jefferson County region. This reflects a major, federally mandated change that some say raises concerns about disrupting care. The nonprofit Passport Health Plan has served all Medicaid recipients in the 16-county region for 15 years. On Thursday, the state Cabinet for Health and Family Services said it had signed 18-month contracts with Passport and three other companies -- Humana, Wellcare of Kentucky and Coventry Cares -- to manage Medicaid recipients’ care starting next year. Other details of the contracts were not released.

The federal government has made it clear that the state it could no longer operate with a single managed-care company in the region and that it must give patients a choice among several providers. In addition to Jefferson, the region’s other counties are Breckinridge, Bullitt, Carroll, Grayson, Hardin, Henry, LaRue, Marion, Meade, Nelson, Oldham, Shelby, Spencer, Trimble and Washington.

According to The Courier-Journal's Tom Loftus, "Passport had hoped that, if the state went with multiple companies, it initially would assign all recipients to it and then give them an option of moving to another company. Instead, the cabinet initially will assign recipients to one of the four companies. The cabinet said the state will use 'a high-tech matching system' that assigns a person based on 'available provider networks and any special health care needs.' (Read more)

Andrea Bennett, deputy director of Kentucky Youth Advocates, said the new system raises concerns for child advocates. "While we still have threads of hope, we cannot ignore the ongoing Medicaid managed care issues that have occurred throughout the rest of the state over the past year.  . . . We’ve heard providers threaten to give up on Medicaid altogether because they are frustrated and still not receiving proper payment. We’ve seen lawsuits and fights between the state, the managed care companies, and the providers. And we still haven’t seen hard data showing how managed care is improving quality and access to care for children in the Commonwealth."