Showing posts with label health care industry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care industry. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

UK's Gill Heart Institute joins Appalachian Regional Healthcare to advance specialty heart care in Eastern Kentucky

Appalachian Regional Healthcare, the Appalachian Heart Center and UK HealthCare’s Gill Heart Institute announced a new collaboration to deliver cardiovascular care to Eastern Kentuckians, which will extend the UK's sub-specialty care footprint and increase access to cardiovascular expertise in the area.

Cardiologists Dr. Vidya Yalamanchi, Dr. Rao Podapati and Dr. Srini R. Appakondu from Hazard's Appalachian Heart Center will team up with UK to provide advanced treatment options not before available in the eastern part of the state.

“We look forward to the opportunity to work closely with the physicians and health care providers at Gill Heart Institute to enhance cardiology services to patients in Eastern Kentucky,” said Dr. Yalamanchi. “This partnership is an example of teamwork that emphasizes a commitment to providing exemplary patient care.”

In addition to the combined efforts in Hazard, UK and ARH have also agreed to jointly administer and manage cardiovascular services at ARH hospitals in Harlan, Whitesburg, McDowell, Hyden and Williamson, W.Va.

 “The goal of this collaboration is to expand the scope of cardiology services provided within our community,” said Joe Grossman, president of ARH. “By providing a range of comprehensive cardiology services, including inpatient and outpatient services to residents of Eastern Kentucky, we hope to improve lives in a region where patients suffer from some of the highest rates of mortality in the nation from heart disease and stroke.”

UK officials have said their hospital must expand its geographical reach to ensure access to quality care for Kentuckians. This collaboration represents a step towards achieving both this goal and the goal of being the hospital destination for sub-specialty care in the state and region.

“This alliance further expands the UK HealthCare mission to improve access to quality health care delivery for all Kentuckians in a cost effective and responsible manner,” Dr. Michael Karpf, UK executive vice president of health affairs, said in the release. “But the real benefit for many patients and their loved ones will be the ability to stay close to home for complex cardiology care.”

Friday, 26 July 2013

Health Watch USA hosts chief medical director of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services in Lexington and online July 31

Dr. Patrick Conway, chief medical director of the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, will be presenting to Kentucky-based Health Watch USA on July 31 at 5 p.m., and with a few clicks on the computer, you can attend virtually.

Conway will be discussing CMS goals and the results of its value-based quality improvement programs, physician fee schedule quality proposals and future opportunities for CMS collaboration aimed to drive health-care quality.

Using your computer, you can attend and participate in the discussion through an online chat while listening to Conway's presentation and viewing the slides. Just click here to log into the conference's webpage and Adobe Connect will download to your computer free of charge.

The online login will be active 15 minutes before the presentation on July 31, and the presentation slides will be available to download as a PDF from the conference page. You can also attend the presentation at the Northside Library in Lexington. Click here for more information.

Health Watch USA, based in Somerset, was founded by Dr. Kevin Kavanagh to promote health care transparency and patient advocacy, says its website.

Wednesday, 17 July 2013

U.S. News gives Kosair Children's Hospital a national ranking; 11 other Kentucky hospitals make 'high-performing' list

Each year, U.S. News and World Report publishes its "Best Hospitals" guide for people seeking a high level of specialty care. The only Kentucky hospital to be nationally ranked in the report for 2014 is Kosair Children's Hospital in Louisville. It received national rank in these areas of specialty care: heart, lung, neurology, cancer, orthopedics and urology.

While no Kentucky hospitals were nationally ranked in adult specialty categories, 11 Kentucky hospitals made the cut for meeting standards of strong performance within the state:
     1. St. Elizabeth Edgewood - 11 high-performing specialties
     2. Baptist Health Louisville - 10 high-performing specialties
     2. University of Kentucky Albert B. Chandler Hospital - 10
         high-performing specialities
     4. Baptist Health Lexington - 9 high-performing specialties
     5. Jewish Hospital in Louisville - 7 high-performing specialties
     6. Norton Hospital in Louisville  - 5 high-performing specialties
     7. University of Louisville Hospital - 2 high-performing specialties
     8. King’s Daughters Medical Center in Ashland - 1 high-performing specialty
     8. St. Elizabeth Florence - 1 high-performing specialty
     8. St. Elizabeth Fort Thomas- 1 high- performing specialty
     8. St. Joseph East- 1 high-performing specialty

To read more about specialty rankings for each hospital, click here for an article in The Lane Report or here for the U.S. News report.

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Lexington internist, Dr. Ardis Hoven, becomes president of the AMA, the nation's largest physician organization

Ardis Dee Hoven, M.D., an internal medicine and infectious disease specialist in Lexington, was installed as president of the American Medical Association at its annual meeting Tuesday night in Chicago. The AMA is the nation's largest physician organization.

Dr. Hoven is a graduate of the University of Kentucky medical school, and she has served in numerous leadership position for the AMA, including her first presidential term in 1993-94. Hoven has also served at the UK’s Bluegrass Care Clinic, which treats infectious diseases including HIV/AIDS, reports Business Lexington.

The AMA is headquartered in Chicago, and since 1847 it has aimed "to promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health," says its website. Furthermore, the organization's strategic focus is aligned with many of the health care issues now facing Kentucky, which are improving health outcomes, accelerating change in medical education and enhancing the sustainability of medical practice.


Wednesday, 12 June 2013

UK Board of Trustees OKs $31 million plan to outfit another floor of new hospital with eye toward federal certification for heart work

The University of Kentucky Board of Trustees has given UK HealthCare the green light for its $31 million plan to outfit the eighth floor of Pavilion A at UK Chandler Hospital over the next few months to make room for a growing cardiovascular program and to clear the way for a federal "Center of Excellence" certification.

After the project is complete, the floor will hold 64 beds, including 24 intensive-care beds for the cardiovascular program that offers heart transplantation, artificial hearts and ventricular devices, reflecting UK's focus on receiving the federal certification.

In the near future, such a designation will be necessary to get enough referrals from doctors and smaller hospitals to maintain important services, including cardiovascular services, and to guarantee that Kentuckians can get the care they need inside the state, Dr. Michael Karpf, executive vice president for health affairs, said in an interview with Kentucky Health News this spring.

Karpf and other UK HealthCare officials are also recommending a $30 million cost-reduction program for their system because Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements are expected to decline as competition stiffens over the next few years, reports Linda Blackford of the Lexington Herald-Leader.

In response to these forces, UK has a goal to secure half the available business from out-of-state competitive areas over the next 10 years to remain viable in a highly competitive market. And, focusing on complex care should drive revenue for the hospital because UK makes money on the complex stuff, Karpf told KHN.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2013/06/10/2673382/uk-healthcare-using-30-million.html#storylink=cpy

The $592 million, 12-floor patient tower has remained half-empty since 2010, and when the estimated $530 million project to fully occupy the tower is added to the initial cost of constructing Pavilion A, the total price tag will top $1 billion over 20 years, reports Blackford.

The overall construction and expansion is expected to support patient care for the next 100 years, says a recent UK press release. Once it's fully occupied, the the 1.2 million-square-foot facility will include 512 private patient rooms.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2013/06/10/2673382/uk-healthcare-using-30-million.html#storylink=cp

Friday, 27 July 2012

Reports show impact of health-care industry in each of Kentucky's 120 counties

It's not often that such detailed data is broken down to the county level, but a new report looks at the economic impact of the local health-care system in each of Kentucky's 120 counties.

The reports, compiled at the University of Kentucky, look at the number of health-care jobs, as well as the revenue and income generated by the local health-care system. In many rural counties, the authors note, health care is the second largest industry, second only to local government.

The most important economic role of the health-care sector is to "keep local health-care dollars at home," the report says. If private insurance, consumer out-of-pocket payments and Medicare and Medicaid transfer payments aren't kept local, an outmigration of health-care services can take place. "This bypass of local health care remains an important issue for many rural health care providers and rural communities."

Conversely, if the local health-care sector can attract patients from outside the area, health care "can act as an export industry," the authors note. Because doctors and other providers can help improve the health and productivity of the local workforce, the health-care sector can also help an area recruit new and retain existing business.

The county reports include a comparison of household income with the state and nation, and indicates how that income is earned. In Boyle County, for example, 55.6 percent was earned through place-of-work earnings, while 22.6 percent was from transfer payments, such as those from Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. The reports also break down how much income is generated according to industry type, from 2000 to 2008.

Income earned by Boyle County residents working in the health-care sector increased 42 percent in those years, one of the largest areas of gains in the county. In all, health care accounted for 13 percent of industry in Boyle and generated more than $322 million in sales, more than $151 million in labor income and nearly 3,500 jobs in the area.

The report, available here, was compiled by Dr. Alison Davis, director of the Community and Ecomomic Development Initiative in Kentucky, part of UK's College of Agriculture. It was funded by the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Friday, 16 March 2012

Kentucky hospitals say they gave back $1.67 billion to their communities in 2010, mostly by absorbing losses and bad debts

By Tara Kaprowy
Kentucky Health News

With the downturn in the economy part of the reason, Kentucky's hospitals say they gave back a whopping $1.67 billion to their communities in 2010, mainly by providing care for which they were never paid.

That's 13 percent more than the hospitals reported last year, and just one of many figures in the latest annual report from the Kentucky Hospital Association, which runs a little over a year behind because it takes a long time to compile the data from more than 100 hospitals.

KHA's 2010 Community Benefits Report shows hospitals absorbed $435.5 million in bad debt in 2010, which accrued when patients came to the hospital and were treated but did not pay their bills.

Shortfalls in Medicare and Medicaid payments cost even more — $456.2 million — because the federal government reimburses Kentucky hospitals for about 85 percent of the cost of Medicaid patients and 95 percent for those on Medicare. That's big, because 71 percent of patient days in Kentucky are covered by one of these programs, said Pam Mullaney, KHA's director of membership services. Hospitals also gave $274 million to charity-care programs that are set up to include free or discounted care to people who are unable to pay. Those three categories of losses increased by more than $158 million over 2009. KHAcalls them community benefits because "you're not getting any type of margin," Mullaney said.

A 2009 Thomson Reuters study showed the average U.S hospital reported an operating profit margin of 3.7 percent. The average operating margin at Kentucky hospitals was 2.44 percent in 2009. Forty percent of hospitals lost revenue from patient services that year, Mullaney said. Still, reported community benefits increased by 13 percent, a total of $190 million.

This is the third year of the report, which was based on a voluntary survey to which 104 of 123 hospitals responded (Eight hospitals were not surveyed because they treat limited types of patients, such as veterans, children or psychiatric cases.) Mullaney said the number of hospitals turning in figures "has grown a little bit each year, but it’s not consequential."

Hospitals are asked to describe and put a value on the programs and activities they provide at or below cost that help their community. Though community benefits are "the greatest single affirmation of not-for-profit hospitals' tax-exempt status," Mullaney said data show Kentucky's 26 for-profit hospitals "do every bit as much as the not-for profits."

In the past two years, Pikeville Medical Center has absorbed $70 million in charitable care and bad debt. The Murray-Calloway County Hospital is in the ninth healthiest county in Kentucky, but has felt the crunch too. From 2010 to 2011, bad debt increased from $7 million to $7.8 million and charity care increased from $5.1 million to $6.2 million.

T.J. Samson Community Hospital in Glasgow has also seen bad debt increase and business decrease when the economy crashed and then stagnated. "Our elective procedure volumes have come down. Patients often wait until they're sicker before they come in," said Laura Belcher, director of planning, marketing and development. The hospital has responded by cutting costs, adopting the "lean philosophy" of eliminating waste and streamlining processes.

Interestingly, the hospital is also pushing for more preventive care since the economy went south. "People ask us, 'Aren't you putting yourself out of business?' But we really want people to be proactive about their health. We've done a lot more health fairs, more screenings," Belcher said.

Indeed, the report shows Kentucky hospitals spent $500 million in 2010 to actively help their communities, through such activities as health screenings, support groups, research, training of nurses and doctors, addiction recovery and neonatal intensive care, or simply donating money to community functions. Many of these programs "are provided at no cost or at a financial loss and would not be provided if the decision was based on monetary decisions," Mullaney said.

Realizing there was a need in the area for children with special needs, the Glasgow hospital set up C.A.M.P. T.J. Kids, a weeklong day camp in the summer for children with special needs. "These children often receive services through school and during school," Belcher said. "But we found many of the families could not afford or handle the transportation to get here during the summer. This is almost like a summer booster."

The camp falls under the umbrella of the Discovery Academy, funded by the hospital and money raised by volunteers. The academy also hosts an annual overnight camp for children with autism. While the children swim in the hotel pool or interact with each other, parents are "in a conference setting to learn about ways they can learn to be better parents" to kids with autism, Belcher said. "In the evening, while children are being supervised, the parents get to go for a quiet, romantic dinner."

When tornadoes struck Kentucky March 2, Pikeville Medical Center kicked into high gear and co-hosted a radio-a-thon that raised $200,000. "We allowed our employees to donate their vacation time, which we converted to actual dollars based on their rate of pay, and we offered employees the ability to do payroll deductions to contribute to the cause," said Cindy Johnson, director of public relations and the Medical Leader, the hospital's community newspaper.

The Murray hospital has increased its community outreach efforts and adopted a mission to provide the local school system with athletic trainers, whose salaries are paid entirely by the hospital, as well as school nurses, which are partly hospital funded. The goal is to promote health and wellness, said marketing director Melony Bray.

The KHA's Mullaney said the annual report reminds people what their hospital does. "A lot of times people think of their hospital as a place to go when they need emergency help," she said. "They don't think of the hospital as one of the big providers in the community for health fairs, health professional education, types of efforts in the community to help improvements like playgrounds and common spaces. Those are things that hospitals often get overlooked for but they do that because they are part of the community."

Kentucky Health News is a service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues, based in the School of Journalism and Telecommunications at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Monday, 5 March 2012

Cost of an MRI in America? $1,080. France? $280. Why? providers 'largely charge what they can get away with'

Why does getting an MRI in the United States cost $1,080 when it only costs $280 in France? The answer comes down to how the prices are set, reports Ezra Klein for The Washington Post.

"That may sound obvious," he writes. "But it is, in fact, key to understanding one of the most pressing problems facing our economy. In 2009, Americans spent $7,960 per person on health care. Our neighbors in Canada spent $4,808. The Germans spent $4,218. The French, $3,978."

The difference in expenditures isn't linked to the idea that Americans just use more health-care services (the opposite is actually true) or that we are sicker. A 2003 study on international heath-care costs and a survey released Friday by the International Federal of Health Plans both concluded it comes down to pricing. The latest survey showed that in 22 of 23 medical services, whether that was a routine doctor visit or coronary bypass surgery, Americans paid more than other developed countries.

The difference is based on the way the pricing is set. "Other countries negotiate very aggressively with the providers and set rates that are much lower than we do," said Gerard Anderson, who was involved in the 2003 study. In Canada and Britain, prices are set by the government. In Germany and Japan, the prices are "set by providers and insurers sitting in a room and coming to an agreement, with the government stepping in to set prices if they fail," Klein reports.

Outside of Medicare and Medicaid, which are cheaper than the commercial average, "it's a free-for-all" in the U.S., Klein wriotes. "Providers largely charge what they can get away with, often offering different prices to different insurers, and an even higher price to the uninsured."

Because the customer often doesn't have choice in whether or not he or she will purchase health care — one could be unconscious or very ill — "sellers of health-care services in America have considerable power to set prices, and so they set them quite high," Klein reports.

Fixing the problem is fraught with complication, Klein writes, because "centralized bargaining cuts across the grain of America's skepticism of government solutions." The prices are also set by very powerful industries. The federal health care reform law is not expected to fix the issue, Klein writes, though might spread awareness since there are provisions to expand transparency; hospitals will have to publish their prices, for example. "But this is, for the most part, a fight the bill ducked, which is part of the reason that even its most committed defenders don't think we'll be paying anything like what they're paying in other countries anytime soon," Klein write. (Read more)

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

A look at the history of U.S. health care and health insurance

Health insurance in the U.S. has some of its roots in the World War II shipyards of Henry J. Kaiser, who built 747 vessels for the Navy. The war made workers scarce, so Kaiser needed a way to attract them and, once there, keep them healthy. He couldn't pay them more because wages were frozen, so he offered them health care, which was provided by doctors at company clinics and hospitals. In turn, he asked employees to kick in 50 cents a week for the benefit. (Photo: Kaiser Shipyards in Richmond, Calif., courtesy of SanPedro.com/Permanente Metals Corporation)

"The war ended, the workers quit the shipyards, leaving behind hospitals and doctors but no patients," Bob Rosenblatt reports for the Los Angeles Times. "So the company decided to open the system to the public — and that's how generations of Californians who never heard of Kaiser shipyards have since gotten medical care."

Kaiser's story is just one example of how America's health insurance system developed, Rosenblatt writes. As at the shipyards, most people still get coverage through their jobs and, unlike the rest of the industrialized world, not from the government.

In fact, there has long been a fight against having the government in charge of providing care, Rosenblatt contends. In 1918, when California proposed a constitutional amendment that would have organized a state-run program, doctors said "compulsory social health insurance" was "a dangerous device invented in Germany." The amendment lost, but many presidents pursued the issue. Franklin D. Roosevelt "flirted with the idea but never threw political muscle behind it," Rosenblatt reports. Harry S. Truman asked Congress to provide national health insurance, but could not bring it to a vote.

It was the model exemplified in the shipyards that was adopted, and "health insurance became a standard feature in labor contracts," Rosenblatt writes.

Things changed in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson pushed through a heavily Democratic Congress what Rosenblatt calls "a legislative three-layer cake:" Medicare Part A, Medicare Part B, and the federal-state Medicaid program. The legislation was controversial, with fears that doctors would refuse to see Medicare patients and hospitals would refuse to dismantle segregated wards. "The doctors didn't strike," Rosenblatt writes. "And the hospitals were immediately integrated without protest."

In 1993, President Bill Clinton wanted to extend national health insurance to everyone, but Rosenblatt says "Congress felt excluded and insulted, and the plan never came to a floor vote in the House or Senate."

President Obama did the opposite and relied on the congressional process. "Key to the plan was a mandate that everyone buy into the system; it was the best way to spread out the costs of illness," Rosenblatt writes. It's that mandate up for debate in the Supreme Court next month, but even if the Affordable Care Act is subsequently thrown out, "people already enjoy some benefits and won't want to give them up," Rosenblatt writes.

"It seems a safe bet that some provisions in the Affordable Care Act will stay on the law books," Rosenblatt concludes. "This places a few more patches on the national healthcare quilt. That's the American way." (Read more)

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

Home births increase, mostly in rural areas

Home birth is making a resurgence in the U.S., reports Shari Roan of the Los Angeles Times. It used to be commonplace in rural areas where doctors were few and transportation wasn't easy. As those factors faded, mothers chose hospitals over bedrooms, and the rate of home birth fell to less than 1 percent of all births by 1969. It's still not as common, but the rate has risen 29 percent from 2004 to 2009, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The trend is strongest in northwestern states, including Oregon at 2 percent and Montana at 2.6 percent, probably because of "sheer lack of transportation in rural areas," Roan reports. Cost may also be a factor because home births are about one-third the cost of hospital births. About 62 percent of home births in 2009 were attended by midwives, and the trend is increasing most among white women. (Read more)

Tuesday, 31 May 2011

Health care is top-spending legislative lobby in Kentucky

Kentucky's health-care industry spent about $1.5 million, more than any other industry, to lobby state legislators in  in the first four months of the year.

"Health care spending was led by hospital operators, who spent about $300,000, including Kentucky Hospital Association ($56,000), Norton Healthcare ($44,631), Baptist Healthcare System ($42,800) and St. Elizabeth Healthcare ($28,182)," the Lexington Herald-Leader's Jack Brammer writes, from a report by the Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission.

Pharmaceutical companies and pharmacies spent the second highest amount, about $281,000. That includes contributions from the Consumer Healthcare Products Association ($67,333), Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America/PhRMA ($23,362), Amgen ($19,389), Glaxo SmithKline ($18,500), American Pharmacy Cooperative ($18,000) and Pfizer ($15,000).

Other big spenders include the Kentucky Medical Association ($71,415); All Things Good, a Louisville-based chiropractic business ($65,000); Kentucky Optometric Association ($61,604); and Kentucky Academy of Eye Physicians & Surgeons ($26,000).

A total of about $7 million was spent on legislative lobbying in Kentucky in the first four months of 2011. About $6.5 million of that was spent by 660 employers of lobbyists and about $445,000 was spent by lobbyists themselves. The insurance industry, which is often related to the health industry, spent about $354,000. Energy and utility interests like coal and natural gas spent $516,000. Reports filed by employers and legislative agents are compiled on the Legislative Ethics Commission's website. For the Herald-Leader story, go here.